Saturday, May 30, 2015

Conservative guesses ‘global warming’ is real cause of libtardation

From here:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I admit it. Global warming is real and is warping Americans’ brains. Either that or Democrats are really, really dumb. They voted for Barack Obama … twice. They think our economy is in “recovery.” Now they are getting ready to vote for Hillary Clinton. It must be global warming.

What else explains the stupidity, idiocy and delusion? What else explains the self-destructive behavior? What else explains Obama refusing to lift a finger to stop ISIS, in denial there is a problem,  after ISIS has already taken over half of Syria and Iraqi city after city, headed for Baghdad, while Obama keeps repeating the massive lie: “I have a plan.” A plan? Obama won’t even admit the “IS” in ISIS stands for Islamic State. Win the war? We aren’t even allowed to call a Muslim a Muslim! Can you imagine in World War II if we weren’t allowed to call Germans Nazis?

Your typical Democrat voter is either an idiot or maybe global warming is real and turning their brains to mush.

Every Democrat in the country screamed in shock and dismay when George W. Bush added $4 trillion in debt, yet they don’t see a thing, hear a thing or say a thing about Obama adding $8 trillion — and by the end of his second term $12 trillion, three times more.

Has global warming turned them all into brain-dead zombies?

Clinton erased 32,000 emails, promising they were none of our business. She wiped her server clean and refuses to discuss it. Her Democratic supporters say, “Nothing to see here,” and echo her famous, “What difference does it make?” Surely, they can’t be that stupid!

It must be global warming causing them to bury their empty heads in the sand.

Hillary, while secretary of state, collected $2 billion for the Clinton Foundation, mostly from foreign governments. Then those same countries were awarded government contracts and awards. Anyone else would be tried for treason and bribery. A Republican doing the same thing would be worried about spending years in prison, not the White House.

Obama and Hillary covered up the Benghazi scandal — arms dealing, a terrorist attack and murders — to win the 2012 election. What do her Democrat supporters say about all this? “What difference does it make?”

It can only be global warming hollowing out the brains of Democrats.

Hillary took millions of dollars in donations from governments that stone, whip and jail women for “the crime” of being rape victims. Yet she claims to be a hero for women’s rights and that Republicans are at war with women. What do Democrats say? “Right on, Hillary!”

Only global warming causing severe mental illness could explain this.

Hillary says she “fights for the middle class” while demanding $250,000 per speech, plus a private jet and the presidential suite at the fanciest hotel in town, while giving speeches at colleges where middle-class kids will graduate with massive debt and no job prospects.

Then she complains about CEO compensation while collecting $30 million in the past 16 months for selling her influence as secretary of state. Yet Democrats and young progressives ignore the blatant corruption and hypocrisy. Surely, they aren’t that stupid?

It must be due to global warming that has melted their brains to the point they couldn’t spell “cat” if we spotted them the “C” and the “A.” They just walk forward like zombies, eyes looking up through their skulls, mumbling: “Hillary, Hillary, Hillary!”

Obama and John Kerry call “global warming” and “climate change” America’s biggest threat, worse than terrorism. They say we must reconfigure the entire U.S. economy and kill coal and oil to become a “green energy nation” while ignoring the fact that the green energy sham has destroyed the EU, left the continent in economic collapse, killed millions of jobs and produced youth unemployment rates of 55 percent or higher in “green countries” like Spain.

The media never mentions the “inconvenient fact” that the results in the EU are so bad even socialist leaders now publicly admit that green energy kills jobs and bankrupts nations. Nor do they mention that while the EU has scuttled the greenhouse gas emissions standards that killed economies, Obama demands we institute those same standards in America. Insanity.

How can it be that the mainstream media doesn’t think to mention any of this? How could Democrats not notice the tragedy in Spain, Greece, Italy or France? Green energy saves the planet while it destroys the economy. So you’re broke, living in misery, starving. And you’re breathing the same dirty air. Because no matter how many jobs you kill in the interest of saving the planet, China and India just keep doubling their pollution. So you’ve accomplished nothing — except ruining your economy. No one thinks to mention this?

Global warming is the only possible reason this is happening. It must be like heroin combined with crack cocaine and crystal meth. There must be a genetic weakness within the DNA of Democrats and the mainstream media.

Obamacare is a proven failure. How do I know? The two most liberal, brain-dead states where everyone loves Obama and big government have given up: Vermont and Hawaii. Vermont just closed its entire healthcare experiment. It went bankrupt. Obamacare exchanges across America are going broke – including in Hawaii. If Obamacare can’t work in Hawaii with a small population and $205 million in taxpayer subsidies, it can’t work anywhere.

Then, there are cities like Chicago, Detroit and Baltimore that have been run 100 percent by Democrats and progressive policies for 50 straight years. All are bankrupt, abandoned, violent, crime-ridden hellholes. Residents, in all but the most affluent neighborhoods, live in misery. After pouring billions into them, their schools are a disaster. Drugs are sold in broad daylight. No one can walk the streets at night; violent animals rule. But Democrats want to use the exact same policies to “save” America.

Global warming has to be the cause, and it must turn Democrats into brain-dead zombies.

America, under Obama, has become a low-wage, part-time economy with close to zero gross domestic product growth. Obama has presided over a record 40+ straight months of 46 million or more citizens on food stamps — a permanent underclass living in misery, just like in Cuba, Venezuela and Greece. Why would anyone be surprised? Obama is using the exact same progressive policies as the socialists in Cuba, Venezuela and Greece. But Democrats don’t notice.

I can only think global warming is the leading cause of blindness and deafness in Democrats.

Something has obviously dumbed down the young people. They are clueless that the Obama plan is printing trillions of dollars in new, fake money, thereby forcing the stock market to record heights.

That makes Obama’s biggest donors wealthy beyond their wildest imagination, but leaves the average middle-class kid with the bill: a crushing $250,000 of debt. They are graduating from college with massive debt and no opportunity for a decent job — to live in their parents’ basement in record numbers. Yet college grads vote Democrat because they get free contraception and abortion.

Global warming must be especially deadly to young brains, leaving holes the size of manhole covers.
My fellow Jewish Americans don’t notice Obama’s hatred of Israel and that every action proves he is on side of radical Muslims. “He is Israel’s best friend,” say delusional Jewish Democrats.

But Israelis know the truth. They see Obama as the worst American president by a landslide. It isn’t even close: 63 percent versus 16 percent for second place (Jimmy Carter). Forget global warming.

Israelis see Obama as the biggest threat to their existence.  

The results of this poll prove American Jews are living in a make-believe world of rainbows and unicorns. It has to be global warming.

The Amtrak crash proves anyone not admitting government is a failure is a complete, blithering idiot. Amtrak has lost more than $40 billion, and its results are still getting worse. So Democrats demand more government spending on Amtrak. Only a zombie or lobotomy victim would decide more spending will solve the problem after 40 years of failure, incompetence and waste of taxpayer money.

It must be the global warming because anyone who wants to waste more money on Amtrak also believes in the tooth fairy and the Loch Ness monster.

Something has created brain-dead zombies that ignore the obvious connection between Obama’s all-time record levels of spending, debt, taxes and regulations — and the fact that for the first time in the history of America, more businesses fail each day than open each day. Then those same zombies conclude: “I have the answer. Let’s add even more regulations.”

It must be global warming hollowing out their heads like a pumpkin on Halloween. Come to think of it, Democrats do have that same kind of smile as a jack-o-lantern.

Democrats don’t seem to notice the fact that Obama spent a billion dollars of your money to build and fix the defective Obamacare websites — money given to foreign companies, one of them run by Michelle Obama’s Princeton Black Alumni Association college classmate. That scandal alone should have led to Obama’s impeachment. But Democrats were too busy watching “Dancing with the Stars.”

Democrats don’t seem to notice health insurance premiums and co-pays have doubled and tripled for middle-class Americans (the group paying the bill) or that inflation is back, caused by massive jumps in healthcare spending.

No one seems to care, and the media don’t see a story.

They are living in the dark and silence at the same time.

Paul Krugman of The New York Times just wrote about the lies and fraud committed by George W. Bush over the Iraq war. Yet he doesn’t notice Obama committed massive fraud when he sold Obamacare by saying, “If you like your insurance, you can keep it,” and, “If you like your doctor, you can keep him,” and, “Obamacare will lower prices,” and, “Obamacare will lower the deficit.” Krugman never saw any of that.

It has to be global warming. It turns even Nobel Prize winners into idiots foaming at the mouth.
Liberals like Krugman hate bullying. It’s their cause célèbre. But they didn’t notice that Obama used the IRS in a widespread criminal conspiracy to target, intimidate, bankrupt and bully his critics, while trying to silencing free speech. Obama makes Richard Nixon look like Mother Teresa. Obama is the “mother of all bullies.”

Finally, liberals like Krugman don’t notice that progressive policies have turned Cuba into the country that time forgot, forever frozen in 1950. Those same progressive policies have led to food and toilet paper shortages in Venezuela. Those same progressive policies have left hospitals in Greece without painkillers or gauze.

Liberals don’t notice that big government, big spending, big taxes, big regulations, big unions and free healthcare cripple every nation and bankrupt every economy they touch.

Those are the same progressive policies that Obama has used to damage the U.S. economy beyond repair. We are in slow-motion disaster headed toward the end of America. The people who support and defend Obama and Hillary are clearly brain dead.

It must be super-charged rays of sun burning holes in their minds. Global warming must be shrinking brains to pea-size. It’s clear now: Democrats are being lobotomized.

Global warming must be real.

Either that or Democrats are so dumb and blind they shouldn’t be let out of the house without diapers and a security guard.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America and save us from the brain-dead zombies in the Democratic Party.


From here:

American-Islamic group responds to protest outside mosque

Posted: May 28, 2015 6:59 PM EDTUpdated: May 30, 2015 12:41 AM EDT
PHOENIX -A protest and counter-protest took place outside of the Islamic Community Center in Phoenix.

Organizers of the protest dubbed it a freedom of speech event, which included a Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest. Several of the protesters in attendance wore anti-Islam clothing and were seen exercising their second amendment rights.

Numerous Phoenix Police officers stood in a line between the protesters and a group of counter-protesters who arrived as the event began.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations has a response to the protest. "Teaching people hate, and teaching people ways to kill people and throw pig blood or whatever it is these days, it's just really sad to see that," said Yasir Shareef, with CAIR. 

Local Islamic leaders are urging valley Muslims not to go to the event. 

Ahead of the rally, city of Phoenix workers installed surveillance video camera on light poles outside of the mosque.

Phoenix police and the FBI gathered intelligence and monitored social media, but they say they were more concerned about people who are staying under the radar than they are about organizers and worshippers.

This is the same mosque that Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi attended. They were shot and killed during their attack at a Prophet Muhammed cartoon drawing contest.

Friday's rally is in response to that terrorist incident in Texas, but it's not just worshippers who are on edge. Neighbors are also nervous about what may happen.
"I mean it's pretty scary because it's putting my kids in danger. It's just a religion. Everybody is allowed to practice whatever religion they like. I'm just guessing I'm going to take off with my kids during the time they come," said Adriana Viguiero, a neighbor.

Friday is Jummah, the Muslim day of communal prayer. 

This is mosque also is one of two in the valley that have received threatening letters in the mail. The FBI is still investigating.

Monday, May 25, 2015

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State, sees terror group as a “U.S. strategic asset”

isis cage

From here:

This makes my blood run cold.

It ought to make the hair on the back of every American’s neck stand up.

When I wrote as early as 2011 that it was al Qaeda and their proxies that Obama was aiding and abetting in Libya and Syria, it did not occur to me that he considered those bloody savages a ‘strategic asset’ — an ally.

On what planet would the United States of America share an espirit de corp with these monsters?

According to Judicial Watch: ”The document shows that as early as 2012, U.S. intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a U.S. strategic asset.”

This is catastrophic consequence of a foreign (and domestic) policy void of acknowledging and/or understanding the jihad threat. The denial of jihad religious and ideological motivation behind this terrible holy war on the West and secular or ‘heretical’ Muslims, has allowed to metastasize at breaking speed.

Look at what Obama and his party of treason has unleashed on the world.
2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime” The Levant report, By Brad Hoff, May 19, 2015

On Monday, May 18, the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch published a selection of formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department through a federal lawsuit.

While initial mainstream media reporting is focused on the White House’s handling of the Benghazi consulate attack, a much “bigger picture” admission and confirmation is contained in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency documents circulated in 2012: that an ‘Islamic State’ is desired in Eastern Syria to effect the West’s policies in the region.


The DIA report, formerly classified “SECRET//NOFORN” and dated August 12, 2012, was circulated widely among various government agencies, including CENTCOM, the CIA, FBI, DHS, NGA, State Dept., and many others.

The document shows that as early as 2012, U.S. intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a U.S. strategic asset.

While a number of analysts and journalists have documented long ago the role of western intelligence agencies in the formation and training of the armed opposition in Syria, this is the highest level internal U.S. intelligence confirmation of the theory that western governments fundamentally see ISIS as their own tool for regime change in Syria. The document matter-of-factly states just that scenario.

Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).

The newly released DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:
  • Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria
  • The West identifies with the opposition
  • The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)
  • The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers  supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government
  • “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war'; see 7.B.)
  • Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)
  • A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Islamic Supremacism: The True Source of Muslim ‘Grievances’

From here:


In the ongoing debate (or debacle) concerning free speech/expression and Muslim grievance—most recently on exhibition in Garland, where two “jihadis” opened fire on a “Prophet Muhammad” art contest organized by Pamela Geller—one thing has become clear: the things non-Muslims can do to provoke Islamic violence is limitless—and far exceeds cartoons.

Writes Victor Davis Hanson for example:
[Pamela] Geller, and not the jihadists who sought to kill those with whom they disagreed, was supposedly at fault. Her critics could not figure out that radical Muslims object not just to caricatures and cartoons, but to any iconographic representation of Mohammed. Had Geller offered invitations to artists to compete for the most majestic statue of the Prophet, jihadists might still have tried to use violence to stop it. Had she held a beauty pageant for gay Muslims or a public wedding for gay Muslim couples, jihadists would certainly have shown up.  Had she offered a contest for the bravest Islamic apostates, jihadists would have galvanized to kill the non-believers. Had she organized a support rally for Israel, jihadists might well have tried to kill the innocent, as they did in Paris when they murderously attacked a kosher market.
But it’s even worse than that.  The list of things that non-Muslims can do to provoke Islamic violence grows by the day and accords with the list of things subjugated “infidels” must never do, lest they provoke their Islamic overlords as laid out by Islamic law, or Sharia.

As such, the West needs finally to come to terms with the root source of these ubiquitous, easily sparked “Muslim grievances.”

Enter Muslim supremacism.

Islamic doctrine—which teaches that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims,  who are further compared to dogs and cattle—imbues Muslims with this sense of supremacism over the rest of mankind.  And a good portion of Islamic history—when Muslims were for centuries on the warpath, subjugating large swathes of the Old Word—further enforced it.

This sense of Islamic supremacism was dramatically humbled after European powers defeated and colonized much of the Muslim world.  Bred on the notion that “might makes right,” Muslims, for a time, even began emulating the unapologetic and triumphant West.  Turkey, for example, went from being the epitome of Islamic supremacy and jihad against Christian Europe for five centuries to desperately emulating Europe in all ways.  

By the mid-1900s, Turkey became perhaps the most Westernized/secularized “Muslim” nation.

Today, however, as Western peoples willingly capitulate to Islamic mores—in the name of tolerance, multiculturalism, political correctness, or just plain cowardice—Muslims are becoming more emboldened, making more demands and threats, as they realize they need not militarily defeat the West in order to resuscitate their supremacist birthright.  (More appeasement from the bullied always brings about more demands from the bully.)

To understand all this, one need only look to Muslim behavior where it is dominant and not in need of pretense, that is, in the Muslim world.  There, non-Muslim minorities are habitually treated as inferiors.  But unlike the many Western appeasers who willingly accept a subservient role to Islam, these religious minorities have no choice in the matter.

Thus in Pakistan, as Christian children were singing carols inside their church, Muslim men from a nearby mosque barged in with an axe, destroyed the furniture and altar, and beat the children.  Their justification for such violence?  “You are disturbing our prayers…. How dare you use the mike and speakers?”

And when a Muslim slapped a Christian and the latter reciprocated, the Muslim exclaimed “How dare a Christian slap me?!” Anti-Christian violence immediately ensued.

All of this revolves around what I call the “How Dare You?!” phenomenon.  Remember it next time “progressive” media, politicians, and other talking heads tell you that Muslim mayhem and outbursts are products of grievances against the West. Missing from their rationale is the supremacist base of these grievances.

The Conditions of Omar, a foundational medieval Muslim text dealing with how subjugated “infidels” must behave, spells out their inferiority vis-à-vis Muslims.  Among other stipulations, it commands conquered Christians not to raise their “voices during prayer or readings in churches anywhere near Muslims” (hence the axe-attack in Pakistan).  It also commands them not to display any signs of Christianity—specifically Bibles and crosses—not to build churches, and not to criticize the prophet.  (See Crucified Again:Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians for my translation of “The Conditions of Omar.”)

If the supremacist nature of Islamic law is still not clear enough, the Conditions literally commands Christians to give up their seats to Muslims as a show of respect.

By way of analogy, consider when Rosa Parks, a black woman, refused to give up her bus seat to white passengers.  Any white supremacist at the time had sincere grievances: how dare she think herself equal?
But were such grievances legitimate? Should they have been accommodated?  Are the endless “grievances” of Muslims legitimate and should they be accommodated?  These are the questions missing from the debate about easily bruised Muslim sensitivities.

One can go on and on with examples from all around the Islamic world:

In Turkey, a Bible publishing house was once stormed and three of its Christian employees tortured, disemboweled, and finally murdered.  One suspect later said: “We didn’t do this for ourselves, but for our religion [Islam]…. Our religion is being destroyed.”

In Egypt, after a 17-year-old Christian student refused to obey his Muslim teacher’s orders to cover up his cross, the teacher and some Muslim students attacked, beat, and ultimately murdered the teenager.

These Turkish and Egyptian Muslims were truly aggrieved: Islamic law makes clear that Christians must not “produce a cross or Bible” around Muslims. How dare the Egyptian student and Turkish Bible publishers refuse to comply—thus grieving their Muslim murderers?

In Indonesia, where it is becoming next to impossible for Christians to build churches, Christians often congregate outside to celebrate Christmas—only to be attacked by Muslims hurling cow dung and bags of urine at the Christians as they pray.

These Muslims are also sincerely aggrieved: how dare these Christians think they can be a church when the Conditions forbid it?

In short, anytime non-Muslims dare to overstep their Sharia-designated “inferior” status—which far exceeds drawing cartoons—supremacist Muslims will become violently aggrieved.

From here, one can begin to understand the ultimate Muslim grievance: Israel.

For if “infidel” Christian minorities are deemed inferior and attacked by aggrieved Muslims for exercising their basic human rights, like freedom of worship, how must Muslims feel about Jews—the descendants of pigs and apes, according to the Koran—exercising power and authority over fellow Muslims in what is perceived to be Muslim land?

How dare they?!

Of course, if grievances against Israel were really about justice and displaced Palestinians, Muslims—and their Western appeasers—would be aggrieved by the fact that millions of Christians are currently being displaced by Muslim invaders.

Needless to say, they are not.

So the next time you hear that Muslim rage and terrorism are products of grievance—from cartoons to territorial disputes and everything in between—remember that this is absolutely true.  But these “grievances” are not predicated on any human standards of equality or justice, only a supremacist worldview.
Reprinted with author’s permission from Front Page Mag


The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur'an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims' heads.
(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him)."


It's all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn't by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).


So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

"Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/'the gods') will get you!"

...but ONLY islam says:

"Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you ('for god')!"

A forced 'Faith!' ISN'T a "Faith!" at all - it's only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in "allah," you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of "faith" in your crime-god will help us to do so.

Friday, May 22, 2015

Bin Laden's Bookshelf: In the Shadow of Anders Breivik

by Winfield Myers  •  May 21, 2015 at 11:00 pm

Campus Watch
Campus Watch Home  |  Middle East studies in the News  |  Donate

Bin Laden's Bookshelf: In the Shadow of Anders Breivik

On July 22, 2011, the Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik killed seventy-seven people in and near Oslo. Not long before he attacked, he emailed a 1,500-page document titled "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," which included conservative critics of radical Islam among his sources. Immediately, some in the media, academic, and think tank worlds declared these persons guilty by association and charged them with shaping Breivik's thought, even though the manifesto cited about the same number of liberals and conservatives.

Yesterday we were given a look inside the mind of another mass killer when the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released Bin Ladin's Bookshelf, a "sizable tranche of documents recovered during the raid on the compound used to hide Usama bin Ladin." The 409 items range from publicly available U.S. government documents to personal letters from bin Laden to family and fellow terrorists.

They also include a fawning January 2005 Washingtonian magazine profile of Georgetown University Wahhabi apologist John Esposito (he doubts bin Laden read it), who has made a lucrative career of blaming the West for the Middle East's troubles. Two volumes by the radical anti-American, anti-Israel MIT linguist Noam Chomsky make the list: Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies, and Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance, which argues that America's natural trajectory is world domination by force.

Seasoned America-hater William Blum also scored with two volumes: Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, and Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II. Upon learning in 2006 that bin Laden had mentioned him in an audio tape, Blum said, "If he shares with me a deep dislike for certain aspects of U.S. foreign policy, then I'm not going to spurn any endorsement of the book by him. I think it's good that he shares those views."

Whereas the pundits and journalists who heaped scorn on the anti-Islamist writers Breivik cited could do so only by willfully distorting their views and equating reasoned criticism with hate-mongering and bigotry, the radical authors whose books lined bin Laden's shelves lent genuine support to his views, if not his actions. They shared with him an incorrigible antipathy towards America and the West even as their elite reputations lent a veneer of legitimacy to their hate-filled rhetoric. That the man behind the deaths of so many innocents could turn to them for intellectual support should permanently discredit their ideas and their work.

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Hundreds caught up in UK sex abuse investigation

From Ottawa Citizen Thursday May 21, 2015, P.# C3.


Hundreds caught up in sex abuse investigation

Some 261 celebrities and politicians, including sports, TV and music stars, are being investigated for alleged child sex abuse, British police have revealed.

They are among more than 1,400 men suspected by police of being sex predators, as the Home Secretary warned it is only the "tip of the iceberg." The rogues gallery includes 135 TV, film and radio stars, 43 musicians and seven sports figures as well as 76 politicians, the officer in charge of the issue has disclosed. Hundreds of schools, religious institutions, children's homes and sports clubs are also implicated.

Chief Const. Simon Bailey said reports of child sex abuse were increasing on a daily basis and he expected police to receive approximately 116,000 allegations before the end of this year.


From Ottawa Citizen Thursday May 21, 2015, P.# C3.

Climate change denial a security risk: Obama


   u.s. President Barack Obama said Wednesday the threat posed by climate change is evident
all around and that those who deny the "indisputable" science that it is real are putting at
risk the security of the United States and the military sworn to defend it.

   Obama said refusing to act to slow the effects of global warming, including rising seas,
amounts to a "dereliction of duty" and undermines the readiness of U.S. forces, including
of the 218 graduates of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in Connecticut, where he delivered the
commencement address.

"I'm here today to say that climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security,
an immediate threat to our national security," Obama said.

Teacher let students have sex in classroom

From Ottawa Citizen Thursday May 21, 2015, P.# C3.

Teacher let students have sex in classroom

   An Atlanta-area teacher has been arrested after a parent complained he allowed middle school students to have sex in a storage unit in his classroom. Multiple news outlets report 25-year-old Quentin Wright, a math teacher at The Champion School in Stone Mountain, was taken into custody Tuesday. He has been charged with four misdemeanour counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. An arrest warrant says Wright arranged times with students when the classroom would be empty and gave them condoms. The investigation began after a mother said she found text messages between Wright and her son. A DeKalb County Schools spokesman says they are co-operating with the District Attorney's Office and Wright has been removed from the classroom.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015


Watch Innocence of Muslims and verify its content

From here:

Critical Update 05/18/’15: 9th Circus heard arguments Dec. 15 and ruled today, disolving the injunction. “Innocence Of Muslims” has been uploaded to YouTube, about six hours ago.
I will now attempt to embed the video here, followed by J. Smith’s excellent essay on the sources of the conceptual content.
I learned today that the 9th Circus has begun the appelate process and interrogated the lawyers. While we wait for their decision, we can review the video, just not on YouTube.
I am trying an embed and a link, with a risk that the result will be two links. I could not get proper embed code at metacafe.
The Liveleak version has been edited to remove Garcia’s portrayal of UmmQirfa. The video quality leaves much to be desired. Mercifully, it is short.
In reviewing the trailer, I discover an error which I previously overlooked. The Profit’s given name was Kauthar, not Muhammad, an undeserved honorific title he bestowed upon himself later.
Its International Judge Muhammad Day revisited, and you are on the bench; I am presenting the evidence
which will empower you to assess the veracity of the concepts presented by the video clip entitled “Innocence of Muslims”.  Herein you will find quotes from the Qur’an, hadith, Shari’ah & tafsir linked to source for easy confirmation.  You will also find quotes from Tabari’s Tahrik and Guillaume’s translation of Ishaq’s Sira.  To verify them, go to the topical quotes appendix of . Please review the video, then examine the evidence. Note that I have added emphasis, with yellow highlights to bring out the most important clauses.
Moe is portrayed as a demon possessed lunatic, suicidal, terrorist, pederast, lecher and genocidal, barbarian warlord.  If he was, he blessed sure was not a Messenger of God because God would not hire and retain an unrepentant sinner.  God did not allow King David to build his Temple because of David’s adultery & murder. How could he tolerate a close relationship with a child molester, lecher, murderer and genocidal warlord?
If the central concepts conveyed by “Innocence of Muslims” are valid, then Islam is not of God, it is demonic; a horrific fraud and war crime perpetrated against Muslims and the whole human race.
The video begins with a statement that goes against the grain of every U.N. resolution condemning “defamation of Islam”: “Islam = terrorism.  The statement is either true or false. Are men terrorists with Islam and normal humans without it?  Is Islam the cause of terrorism?  The Qur’an and hadith hold evidence which must be examined to find the answer to this crucial question.

Allah said:

I will cast terror

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 3:152.
    And Allâh did indeed fulfil His Promise to you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed
    you (of the booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you,
    and Allâh is Most Gracious to the believers.
  • 8:12.
    (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”

strike terror

  • 8:57.
    So if you interlock (yourself) with them in War — then by (routing) them strike terror
    in those that are behind them
     per chance they get admonition.
  • 8:60.
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, 
    of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

Allah cast terror

  • 33:26.
    And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 33:27
  • And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

You scare them more…

  •  59:13.
    Indeed, you strike more terror in their hearts than their fear of God. This is because they are people who do not comprehend.

Allah rewards terrorists

  • 9:120.
    It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer
    their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn9:121.
    Nor do they spend anything (in Allâh’s Cause) – small or great – nor cross a valley, but is written to their credit, that Allâh may recompense them with the best of what they used to do (i.e. Allâh will reward their good deeds according to the reward of their best deeds which they did in the most perfect manner).

Moe said:

victorious with terror

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:Narrated Abu Huraira:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while
    I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.
    ” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
Allah would cast terror and did cast terror so that people were killed, enslaved and dispossessed. Allah commanded Muslims to strike terror by harsh treatment of defeated victims and by maximizing their military strength.  Allah told Moe that the Jews were more afraid of Moe than of him.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.   Allah promised Muslims extra credit towards an upgrade in their seat in his celestial bordello for any act of terrorism.
Moe deliberately constructed a reputation of barbarian rapine so as to terrify his intended victims, compelling them
to surrender without a fight or making them disorganized, scattered, easy prey.  Terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam. 

Violence against Copts

impunity & complicity

I will leave this matter to an expert: Bill Warner, who compiles the evidence: Bulletin of Christian Persecution July 30 – Aug. 31, 2012.

Demon possession

Did Moe really run home to his wife and hide under her skirt, scared witless?  Sahih Bukhari has the answer to this
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Number 111
    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in the form of good righteous (true) dreams in his sleep. He never had a dream but that it came true like bright day light. He used to go in seclusion (the cave of) Hira where he used to worship(Allah Alone) continuously for many (days) nights. He used to take with him the journey food for that (stay) and then come
    back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food like-wise again for another period to stay, till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him in it and asked him to read. The Prophet replied, “I do not know how to read.” (The Prophet added), “The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it anymore.
    He then released me and again asked me to read, and I replied, “I do not know how to read,” whereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and asked me again to read, but again I replied, “I do not know how to read
    (or, what shall I read?).” Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me and then released me and said, “Read: In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists). Has created man from a clot. Read and Your Lord is Most Generous…up to….. ..that which he
    knew not.” 
    Then Allah’s Apostle returned with the Inspiration, his neck muscles twitching with terror till he entered upon Khadija and said, “Cover me! Cover me! They covered him till his fear was over and then he said, “O Khadija, what is wrong with me?” Then he told her everything that had happened and said, ‘I fear that something may happen to me.” Khadija said, ‘Never! But have the
    glad tidings, for by Allah, Allah will never disgrace you as you keep good reactions with your Kith and kin, speak the truth, help the poor and the destitute, serve your guest generously and assist the deserving, calamity-afflicted ones.” Khadija then accompanied him to (her cousin) Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin ‘Abdul ‘Uzza bin Qusai. Waraqa was the son of her paternal uncle, i.e., her father’s brother, who during the Pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the Arabic writing and used to write of the Gospels in Arabic as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to him, “O my cousin! Listen to the story of
    your nephew.” Waraqa asked, “O my nephew! What have you seen?” The Prophet described whatever he had seen.
    Waraqa said, “This is the same Namus (i.e., Gabriel, the Angel who keeps the secrets) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out.” Allah’s Apostle asked, “Will they turn me out?” Waraqa replied in the affirmative and  said: “Never did a man come with something similar to what you have brought but was treated with hostility. If I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly.” But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, “O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah’s Apostle in truth” whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down
    and would return home. 
    And whenever the period of the coming of the inspiration used to become long, he would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him what he had said before. (Ibn ‘Abbas said regarding the meaning of: ‘He it is that Cleaves the daybreak (from the darkness)’ (6.96) that Al-Asbah. means the light of the sun during the day and the light of the moon at night).
  • Ibn Sa’d Volume 1, Parts 1.51.1Muhammad Ibn `Umar informed us; he said: Yunus Ibn Muhammad Ibn Fudalah
    al-Zafari related to me on the authority of his father; (second chain) he (Ibn Sa’d)
    said: Kathir Ibn Zayd related to me on the authority of al-Muttalib Ibn ‘Abd Allah Ibn Hantab; they said:
    The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had seen his people departing from him.
    He was one day sitting alone when he expressed a desire: I wish, Allah had not revealed to me
    anything distasteful to them
    . Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, approached them (Quraysh) and got close to them, and they also came near to him. One day he was sitting in their assembly near the Ka`bah, and he recited: “By the Star when it setteth”, (Qur’an, 53:1) till he reached, “Have ye thought upon
    Al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other”. (Qur’an, 53:19-20) Satan made him repeat these two phrases: These idols are high and their intercession is expected. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, repeated them, and he went on reciting the whole surah and then fell in prostration, and the people also fell in prostration with him. Al-Walid Ibn al-Mughirah, who was an old man and could not prostrate, took a handful of dust to his forehead and prostrated on it.
    It is said: Abu Uhayhah Sa’id Ibn al-‘As, being an old man, took dust and prostrated on it. Some people say: It was al-Walid who took the dust; others say: It was Abu Uhayhah; while others say: Both did it. They were pleased with what the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had uttered. They said: We know that Allah gives life and causes death. He creates and gives us provisions, but our deities will intercede with Him, and in what you have assigned to them, we are with you. These words pricked the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him. He was sitting in his house and when it was evening, Gabriel, may peace be on him, came to him and revised the surah. Then Gabriel said: Did I bring these two phrases. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: I ascribed to Allah, what He had not said.
    Then Allah revealed to him: “And they indeed strove hard to beguile thee (Muhammad) away from that
    wherewith We have inspired thee, that thou shouldst 
    invent other than it against Us; and then would they have accepted thee as a friend. 

    And if We had not made thee wholly firm thou mightest almost have inclined unto them a little.
    Then had We made thee taste a double (punishment) of living and a double (punishment) of dying then hadst thou found no helper against Us. (Al-Qur’an, 17:73-75. This narration is not acceptable, because none of the first narrators is a Companion. For a detailed discussion see Shibli, Sirat al-Nabi, 1st edition, p. 176)
  • 22:52.
    Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before you, but; when he did recite the revelation or
    narrated or spoke, Shaitân (Satan) threw (some falsehood) in it.

    But Allâh abolishes that which Shaitân (Satan) throws in. Then Allâh establishes His Revelations. And Allâh is All-Knower, All-Wise:

Great Slaughter

Does God desire great slaughter, or does genocide come from Satan’s corner?  Allah made great slaughter Moe’s price of admission to his celestial bordello.
  • 8:67.
    It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.


  • Ibn Sa’d Volume 1, Parts 1.45.4‘Affan Ibn Muslim informed us: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us on the
    authority of Hisham Ibn ‘Urwah, he on the authority of ‘Urwah: Verily, the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said:
    O Khadijah, I see light and hear sounds and I fear I shall be a sooth-sayer
    Verily, Allah will not do it with you, 0 son of `Abd Allah. Verily, you
    speak the truth,
    return things entrusted to you and fulfil (obligations of) relationship.
  • She said:
  • Ibn Sa’d Volume 1, Parts 1.45.5 Yahya 1bn Abbad and `Affan Ibn Muslim informed us; they said: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us; he said: Ammar Ibn Abi `Ammar informed us; (variation)
    Yahya Ibn `Abbád (only) said: Hammad Ibn Salamah said: I think (he narrated) on the authority of Ibn `Abbas:
    Verily, the Prophet, may Allah bless him, said: O Khadijah I hear sounds and see light and I fear I am mad.
    She said: O son of `Abd Allah ! Allah will not do it with you. Then she approached Waraqah Ibn Nawfal and related (the incident) to him.
    He said: If he is true, then he is nomos as in the case of Moses. If I am alive, when he is commissioned (to prophethood) I shall support him, help him and believe in him.


The story of Moe’s child bride is well represented in the authentic hadith collections, compiled in this pdf file:,
I will reproduce one of them here, linked to the source; you can easily find the others by reading the surrounding ahadith and using your favorite hadith search engine to find the rest.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his
    marriage when she was nine years old
    , and then she remained with
    him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
  • The Life of Muhammad, page 311 [Image #180 in the on line archive]. In the riwaya of Yunus I. I. recorded
    that the apostle saw her (Ummu’I-Fadl when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and
    I am still alive I will marry her
    .’ But he died 
    before she grew up and Sufyan b. al-Aswad b. ‘ Abdu’I-Asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him Rizq and Lubaba. . . .

Donkey interview

Yeah, right, Moe asked questions of a donkey and got answers.  This story is one measure of his insanity and the
credulity of Muslims.  For the full story, see:
This OCR result from the Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith  is a bit rough, but you can get the gist of the story. The story is on page 76 of the pdf file, page 41 of the text.
  •, Hydera bad 1970, II, pp. 302 f.
    In one version it was the Prophet who asked the donkey: ‘What is your name?’ ‘ Ya zd b. Shihb’, the don key is said to have answered. Thereupon the Prophet said: ‘But I shall call you Ya fr.’ When it was offered a
    she-ass, it declined. In an other version 
    it was the donkey that began the conversation, telling the Prophet that it was once owned by a Jew.

    Since it made a habit of stumbling on purpose, so that its master fell off, it was refused food and it was regularly given the stick. As the last surviving donkey of his grandfather’s sixty off spring, which had all been
    used in the past by prophets as riding 
    animals, it was now prepared to serve him, the Prophet of Islam, the seal of the prophets. Muhammad used to ride it, and when he was in need of supplies, he used to release it and send it away to the shop of a merchant on whose door it would knock with its head. In a variant: ‘… and when the owner of the store came outside, the donkey would give him a token with its head that he was to love the Messenger of God: ‘A ibba rasla ’llh!’ In a variant we read here: ‘Ajib rasla ’llh!, respond to the Messenger of God!’ When the Prophet died, the donkey went to the well of Ab ’l-Hay tham b. at-Tayyihn and threw itself down there in out of grief, and thus that well became its grave. But, as all versions assert, there was no truth in the story of course and its isnad strand was no good anyhow.
    In Ij., Li sn, ibidem, Ibn al-Jawz is quoted as saying laana ’llhu w iahu!, i.e. may God curse the fabricator of this tradition! For a very detailed study of the asses and mules which are associated with the Prophet, see H. Eisenstein’s paper in Der Is lam, LXII, 1985, pp. 98-107.
  • Tabari Volume VIII, Page 131In this year Hatib b. Abi Balta’ah came back from al-Muqawqis
    bringing Mariyah and her sister Sirin, his female mule Duldul, his donkey Ya’furand sets of garments. With the two women al-Muqawqis had sent a eunuch, and the latter stayed with them.
    Hatib had invited them to become Muslims before he arrived with them, and Mariyah and her sister did so. The Messenger of God lodged them with Umm Sulaym bt. Milhan. Mariyah was beautiful.
    The Prophet sent her sister Sirin to Hassan b. Thabit, and she bore him ‘Abd al-Rahman b. Hassan.
A provincial ruler whom Moe intimidated gave Moe two Christian slaves, the talking donkey and other goods in tribute to appease him and stave off conquest.  Moe gave one slave away and kept the other, assigning her to Hafsa, one of his wives.


It would seem that, after Jesus brought a new dispensation, with celibacy instead of lechery, celibacy would be the model for future prophets.  But not for our hero, Moe.  Moe had nine wives at once and used to divide his time between them. You saw a dramatization of his tryst with Mariyah, a slave who was given to him as tribute, in Hafsa’s bed, on her turn.  Did that really happen?  Would I bring it up here if it did not? Sunan an-Nasa’i holds a clue for you.
  • # 3411 It
    was narrated from Anas,that the Messenger of Alllah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but ‘Aisha and Hafsa would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime. revealed: “O Prophet!
    Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to until the end of .the Verse. (sahih)
  • 66:1. O Prophet! Why do you ban (for yourself) that which Allâh has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives?
    And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.66:2Allâh has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths. And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.
    66:3. And (remember) when the Prophet (PBUH) disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his wives (Hafsah), so when she told it (to another i.e. ‘Aishah), and Allâh made it known to him, he informed part thereof and left a part. Then when he told her (Hafsah) thereof, she said: “Who told you this?” He said: “The All-Knower, the All-Aware (Allâh) has told me”.
    66:4. If you two (wives of the Prophet , namely ‘Aishah and Hafsah) turn in repentance to Allâh, (it will be better for you), your hearts are indeed so inclined (to oppose what the Prophet  likes), but if you help one another against him (Muhammad ), then verily, Allâh is his Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.), and Jibrael (Gabriel), and the righteous among the believers, and furthermore, the angels are his helpers.
    66:5. It may be if he divorced you (all) that his Lord will give him instead of you, wives better than you, Muslims (who submit to Allâh), believers, obedient to Allâh, turning to Allâh in repentance, worshipping Allâh sincerely, fasting or emigrants (for Allâh’s sake), previously married and virgins.
On  pages 88 & 89 of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, we learn a little more about Hafsa and her slave, Moe and Zeinab.  Lechery?  Is it possible?
  • In his adventures with Zeineb, the wife of Zeid, and with Mary, an Egyptian captive, the amorous prophet forgot
  • the interest of his reputation. At the house of Zeid, his frcedman and adopted son, he beheld, in a loose undress, the beauty of Zeineb, and burst forth into an ejaculation of devotion and desire. The servile or grateful freedman

    understood the hint, and yielded, without hesitation, to the love of his benefactor. But, as the filial relation had excited some doubt and scandal, the angel Gabriel descended from heaven to ratify the deed, to annul the adoption, and gently to reprove the apostle for distrusting the indulgence of his God. One of his wives, Hafsa,174 the daughter of Omar, surprised him on her own bed in the embraces of his Egyptian captive; she promised secrecy and forgiveness; he swore that he would renounce the possession of Mary. Both parties forgot their engagements; and Gabriel again descended with a chapter of the Koran, to absolve him from his oath, and to exhort him freely to enjoy his captives and concubines without listening to the clamours of his wives. In a sohtary retreat of thirty days, he laboured, alone with Mary, to fulfil the commands of the angel. When his love and revenge were satiated, he summoned to his presence his eleven wives, reproached their disobedience and indiscretion, and threatened them with a sentence of divorce both in this world and in the next: a dreadful sentence, since those who had ascended the bed of the prophet were for ever excluded from the hope of a second marriage. Perhaps the incontinence of Mahomet may be palliated by the tradition of his natural or preternatural gifts :173 he united the manly virtue of thirty of the children of Adam; and the apostle might rival the thirteenth labour 176 of the Grecian Hercules.177
The marriage: Tabari Vol VIII, pg 134, tells us more about how Moe got Zayd’s wife and issued situational scripture to sanction the deal.
  • Then the Messenger of God married Zaynab bt. Jahsh b. Ri’ab b. Ya’mur b. Sabirah. 895 Previously, she was married to Zayd b. Harithah b. Sharabil, freedman of the Messenger of God, but she did not bear any children with him. (It was) about her that God
    revealed: “When you said to him whom God had blessed and you had favored, ‘Keep your wife to yourself and fear God,’ you concealed within yourself that which God was about to reveal. You feared other
    men, but it is more fitting that you should fear God.
    When Zayd had accomplished the necessary (formality of Divorce) from her, We gave her in marriage to you, so that there should not be any fault for the believers in respect to the wives of their adopted sons,
    after they have performed the necessary formal
    ity [of Divorce] from them. And God’s command must be fulfilled.”896 God married her to him and sent Gabriel concerning that matter. She used to boast to the other wives of the Prophet, saying, “I am the most honored among you because of the One who gave me in marriage and the one who was my intermediary  (i. e., Gabriel) (*akramukunna waliyy’an wa  kramukunna safir’an*).”897
  • 33:37.
    And (remember) when you said to him (Zaid bin Hârithah; the freed­ slave of the Prophet ) on whom Allâh has bestowed Grace (by guiding him to Islâm) and you (O Muhammad  too) have done favour (by manumitting him) “Keep your wife to yourself, and fear Allâh.” But you did hide in yourself (i.e. what Allâh has already made known to you that He will give her to you in marriage) that which Allâh will make manifest, you did fear the people (i.e., Muhammad  married the divorced wife of his manumitted slave) whereas Allâh had a better right that you should fear Him. So when Zaid had accomplished his desire from her (i.e. divorced her), We gave her to you in marriage, so that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the believers in respect of (the marriage of) the wives of their adopted sons when the latter have no desire to keep them (i.e. they have divorced them). And Allâh’s Command must be fulfilled.33:38There is no blame on the Prophet () in that which Allâh has made legal for him.That has been Allâh’s Way with those who have passed away of (the Prophets of) old. And the Command of Allâh is a decree determined. 

  • 33:39. Those who convey the Message of Allâh and fear Him, and fear none save Allâh. And Sufficient is Allâh as a Reckoner.
  • 33:40. Muhammad (PBUH) is not the father of any man among you, but he is the Messenger of Allâh and the last (end) of the Prophets. And Allâh is Ever All­Aware of everything.


Did God have as his last and best messenger an unrepentant murderer?  Moe commissioned hits on critics. He would
have my head for uttering and publishing this blog post which exposes the truth about Moe to public view.  You watched the dramatization of the murder of Um Qirfa, was that for real?  Turn to page 664 of Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad to find out.
  • . Qays b. al-Musahl,1ar al- Ya’muri killed Mas’ada b.Hakamab. Malik b.Hudhayfa b. Badr, and Umm Qirfa Fatima d. Rabi’a b. Badr was taken prisoner.
    She was a very old woman, wife of Malik. Her daughter and  'Abdullah b. Mas’ada were also takenZayd  ordered Qays b. al-Musal,1l,1ar to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly (T. by putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two). Then they brought Umm Qirfa’s daughter and Mas’ada’s son to the apostle. The daughter of Umm Qirfa belonged to Salama b. ‘Amr b.
    al-Akwa’ who had taken her. She held a position of honour among her people, and the Arabs used to say, ‘Had you been more powerful than Umm Qirfa you could have done no more.’ Salama asked the apostle to let him have her and he gave her to him and he presented her to his uncle Hazn b. Abu Wahb and she bare him’ Abdu’I-Ral,1man b. Hazn.
The story of the murder of Kab Ashraf is told in Ishaq on page 367.
  • The apostle said-according to what’ Abdullah b. Abu Burda told me-‘Who will rid me of Ibnu’I-Ashraf?
    IMuhammad b. Maslama, brother of the B. ‘Abdu’I-Ashhal, said, ‘I will deal with him for you, O apostle of God, I will kill him.’ He said, ‘Do so if you can.’ So Muhammad b. Maslama returned and waited for three days without food or drink, apart from what was absolutely necessary. When the apostle was told of this he summoned him and asked him why he had given up eating and drinking. He replied that he had given hi.m an undertaking and he did not know whether he could fulfil it. The apostle said, ‘AIl that is incumbent upon you is that you should try.’ He said, ‘O apostle of God, we shall have to tell lies.’ He answered, ‘Say what you like, for 551 you are free in the matter.’
    Thereupon he and Silkan b. Salama b. Waqsh who was Abu Na’ila one of the B. ‘Abdu’I-Ashhal, foster-brother of Ka’b, and ‘Abbad b. Bishr b. Waqsh, and al-Harith b. Aus b. Mu’adh of the B. ‘Abdu’l-Ashhal and Abu’ Abs b. Jabr of the B.Haritha conspired together and sent Silkan to the enemy of God, Ka’b b. Ashraf, before they came to him. He talked to him some time and they recited poetry one to the other, for Silkan was fond of poetry. Then he said, ‘O Ibn Ashraf, I have come tyou about a matter which I want to tell you of and wish you to keep secret.’
    ‘Very well,’ he replied. He went on, ‘The coming of this man is a great trial to us. It has provoked the hostility of the Arabs, and they are all in league against us. The roads have become impassable so that our families are in want and privation, and we and our families are in great distress.’
    Ka’b answered, ‘By God, I kept telling you, O Ibn Salama, that the things t warned you of would happen.’ Silkan said to him, ‘I want you to sell us food and we will give you a pledge of security and you deal generously in the matter.’ He replied, ‘Will you giv~ me your sons as a pledge?’ He said, YOU want to Insult us. I have fnends who share my opinion and I want to bring them to you so that you may sell to them and act generously and we will give you enough weapons for a good pledge.’ Silkan’s objection was that he should not take alarm at the sight of weapons when they brought them. Ka’b answered, ‘Weapons are a good pledge.’ Thereupon Silkan returned to his companions, told them what had happened and ordered them to take their arms. Then they went away and assembled with him and met the apostle…. Then after a space he did it for the third time, and cried, ‘Smite the enemy of God!’ So they smote him, and their swords
    clashed over him with no effect. Muhammad b. Maslama said, ‘I remembered my dagger when I saw that our swords were useless, and I seized it. Meanwhile the enemy of God had made such a noise that every fort
    around us was showing a light. I thrust it into the 
    lower part of his body, then I bore down upon it until I reached his genitals, and the enemy of God fell to the ground. Al-Harith had been hurt, being wounded either in his head or in his foot, one of our swords having struck hitn. We went away, passing by the B. Umayya b. Zayd and then the B. Quray~a and then Bu’ath until we went up the lJarra of al-‘Urayg.1 Our friend al-Harith had lagged behind, weakened by loss of blood, so we waited for him for some time until he came up, following our tracks. We carried him and brought him to the apostle at the end of the night. We saluted him as he stood praying, and he came out to us, and we told him that we had killed God’s enemy. He spat upon our comrade’s wounds, and both he and we returned to our families. Our attack upon  God’s enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.’2
The Murder of Marwan’s daughter is detailed on page 997.
  • When the apostle heard what she had said he said, ‘Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?‘ ‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he said, ‘You have helped God and His apostle, 0 ‘Umayr! When he asked if he  would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, ‘Two goats won’t butt their heads about her,’ so ‘Umayr went back to his people.

Torture & rape of captives

You saw a dramatization of the torture death of Kinana and seizure of his widow. What is the reality?  Did that
really happen?  For the answer, we turn to Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122.
  • When Safiyyah became the bride of Kinanah b. al-Rabi’ b. AbiHuqayq, she dreamt that a moon had fallen into her lap. She told her vision to her husband, and he said, “That is only because you are wishing for the king of the Hijaz, Muhammad” – and he gave her face a slap that blackened her eye. She was brought to the Messenger of God with the traces of it still there; he asked her what it was, and she told him this story.
    According to Ibn Ishaq: Kinanah b. al-Rabi’ b. Ab al-Huqayq, who had the treasure of the Banu al-Nadir,508 was brought to the Messenger of God, who questioned him; but he denied knowing where it was. Then the Messenger of God was brought a Jew who said to him, “I have seen Kinanah walk around this ruin every morning.” The Messenger of God said to Kinanah: “What do you say? If we find it in your possession, I will kill you.”509 “All right,” he answered. The Messenger of God commanded that the ruin should be dug up, and some of the treasure was extracted from it. Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr  b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “Torture him until you root out what he has.”

    Al-Zubayr kept twirling his fires tick in his breast 510 until Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother Mahmud b.Maslamah.
Did Moe really seize the widow of the man he tortured and add her to his harem?
  •   Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 143
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    The Prophet said to Abu Talha,
    “Choose one of your boy servants to serve me in my expedition to Khaibar.” So, Abu Talha took me letting me ride behind him while I was a boy nearing the age of puberty. I used to serve Allah’s Apostle when he stopped to rest. I heard him saying repeatedly, “O Allah! I seek refuge with You from distress and sorrow, from helplessness and laziness, from miserliness and cowardice, from being heavily in debt and from being overcome by men.” Then we reached Khaibar; and when Allah enabled him to conquer the Fort (of Khaibar), the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was described to him. Her husband had been killed while she was a bride. So Allah’s Apostle selected
    her for himself 
    and took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad-AsSahba,’ where her menses were over and he took her for his wife.
     Haris (a kind of dish) was served on a small
    leather sheet. Then Allah’s Apostle told me to call those who were around me. So, that was the marriage banquet of Allah’s Apostle and Safiya. Then we left for Medina. I saw Allah’s Apostle folding a cloak round the hump of the camel so as to make a wide space for Safiya (to sit on behind him) He sat beside his camel letting his knees for Safiya to put her feet on so as to mount the camel. Then, we proceeded till we approached Medina; he looked at Uhud (mountain) and said, “This is a mountain which loves us and is loved by us.” Then he looked at Medina and said, “O Allah! I make the area between its (i.e. Medina’s) two mountains a sanctuary as Abraham made Mecca a sanctuary. O Allah! Bless them (i.e. the people of Medina) in their Mudd and Sa (i.e. measures).”

Barbarian rapine

Go back and re-read 33:26 & 27 by clicking this link; use your Backspace key to return here.. Moe attacked the settlement, killed the men, raped the women and enslaved the children, seizing their property.  Allah facilitated it.  Was that a singularity?  Is jihad exclusively defensive?  Or is it a regular pattern, part of Moe’s mission?  Examine the evidence carefully before making a decision.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’
    And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.
    ” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
  • Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg. 141  PDF 154 Islamic law
    codified by the Hanifi school of fiqh.
    • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
    • Marginal Note: Infidels may be attacked without provocation.


Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters to intended victims. I include this one because it is extremely clear,
leaving nothing to the imagination.
  • In the name of ALLAH the compassionate, the MercifulFrom Muhammad, Prophet of Allah
    To the People of Aqaba
    May peace be on you. I praise Allah who is one and except whom there is nobody else to be worshipped.
    I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for itIt is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers.
    My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.
    These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare
    cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.
    If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security)Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.
    I assure you that I am a true Prophet of Allah. I believe in Allah, and His Books, and His Prophets and am of the faith that Maseeh (Messiah) son of Mariam (Mary), is a Prophet of Allah and His word.
    Hurmala (Raziallah AnhoA.) who brought to me 3 wasaq (about 6 quintals) of barley, recommended your case. Had it not been in compliance of the command of Allah and the good opinion of Hurmala for you, it would not have been necessary for me to correspond with you and instead of it, there would have been a
    war. If you will obey my messengers, you shall immediately have my support and the help and support of everyone who is attached to me.
    My messengers are Shuraih-beel, Obaiy, Hurmala and Hurais (Raziallah AnhoA.) and whatever decision they take in respect of you, shall be acceptable to me.
    Your people are under the protection and responsibility of Allah and His Prophet.
    Supply provisions to the Jews of Maqna, for their journey to their country.
    If you accept obedience, may peace be on you.’
    Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad .


From page 289 of  Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad:
  • They said that when the apostle heard about Abu Sufyancoming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps God will give it as a prey.’
On page 512 we find another example.
  • ‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one of Aslam told him thatB. Sahm of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He said: ~O God, You know their condition and that they have no strength, and that I have nothing to
    give them, so conquer for them the wealthiest of the enemy’s forts with the richest food.’ The following day God conquered the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh which contained the richest food in Khaybar
You have been told, by bloggers that this is a “crappy” video; by the U.N., President, Secretary of State & Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that it is a ‘disgusting” video.  Now you have seen the evidence of the veracity of the main themes of the video.  Retire to chambers, contemplate the evidence and render your verdict in a comment.